The corruption of the National Anti Corruption Commission and attorney general Mark Dreyfus
Evidence of the concealment of Australian corruption and crimes again evaded
The text below is in part a re-post of the WordPress post of the 26 September 2023 https://rjrbtsrupertsfirstnewspaper.wordpress.com/2023/09/26/the-corruption-of-australias-national-anti-corruption-commission-and-attorney-general-mark-dreyfus/ that has had a document removed/hacked from that post.
That document removed/hacked is a letter dated 22 March 2013 from the Australian Federal Police AFP said to be written on behalf of the attorney general Mark Dreyfus in reply to my correspondence to him regarding Australia’s corruption. That letter can be considered an indication that attorney general Mark Dreyfus has been made aware of the evidence of the corruption of Australia’s law enforcement authorities and has an intention of acknowledging that corruption.
The document removed/hacked from the 26 September 2023 post can be viewed at https://rjrbtsrupertsfirstnewspaper.wordpress.com/2023/12/20/wordpresshackeddecember2023/
Corruption of attorney general Dreyfus and the National Anti Corruption Commission confirmed
Recent 5 December 2023 correspondence from the NACC is included in this WordPress post and confirms its corruption.
That reply to my complaint summarises my complaint excluding the most obvious matters of corruption ignoring the evidence presented. The easy task of verifying that records of newspapers published within Australian state public libraries are fake archives that are part of efforts to conceal corruption and crimes has never been made. The NACC that claims to be the authority to accept and investigate Australia’s corruption are deceptive. The NACC works hard to make communication with it difficult to impossible.
Fraud – To gain a benefit or avoid an obligation by the use of deceit. Fraud/Deception is corruption.
Australian attorney general Mark Dreyfus & the National Anti Corruption Commission NACC evade acknowledging the evidence of corruption of Australia’s federal & state law enforcement, politicians [of both political parties] and news media including the taxpayer funded ABC.
The text below has been sent to Australian attorney general Mark Dreyfus (and others) & the National Anti Crime Commission via this WordPress post, in response to their unsigned email from NACC Intake and Triage. Note the NACC email address cannot accept email sent to the NACC that refuses to provide an email address to send information and documentation.
I have requested that the attorney general Dreyfus and NACC Commissioner acknowledge delivery of this correspondence & reply with a signed communication. The issues of Australian corruption are serious and deserve their personal attention.
The NACC reply of 21 September 2023 to my complaint has disappeared from my email ‘Inbox’ file. It is attached to this email as file ‘NACC reply 21 Sept 2023 XX’. I have only seen & read the text [Forwarded] below today 25 Sept 2023 for the first time. I am unable to ‘Copy and Paste’ text to this Hotmail ‘Compose’ screen. I can only rewrite text that I have written to MicroSoft Office Word to an email compose screen . It appears to be the work of my hacker. I also include the text rewritten below as the attached pdf file ‘Reply to NACC 25 Sept 2023’.
NCA/ACC/ACIC crimes and corruption The corruption of the NCA Freedom of Information release
Letter from NCA P. J. Lamb dated 28 January 1998 https://rjrbtsrupertsfirstnewspaper.files.wordpress.com/2015.11.21-nca-lamb-28-jan-1998-nca-bomb1jpg?w=665
The Freedom of Information release made by the National Crime Authority [NCA – intended to provide me with confirmation of my telephone contact with the NCA in which I advised of a December 1993 jail cell conversation I had during which ‘Nrangheta crime gang member Saverio Catanzariti [NCA bomber’s “Lieutenant”] disclosed his gang’s motivation for the murder of Geoffrey Bowen] has no reference to letter I received from P. J. Lamb dated 28 January 1998 sent to me in January 1998 a few days after I had a telephone conversation with P. J. Lamb & disclosed to him details of that December 1993 jail cell conversation with Catanzariti. There are indications that the conversation with Catanzariti was recorded as part of the investigation into the December 1992 Adelaide NCA bombing murder of Bowen. P. J. Lamb knows that the Adelaide NCA bombing was an event of 2nd March 1992 and that the date of Bowen’s murder was changed to 2nd March 1994 [records of newspapers published have been altered to now be fake archives] – the first news media reference to the 2nd March 1994 date was made in March 1997 in a newspaper article authored by Silva Kriven. The true date of 2nd March 1992 was in 1998 confirmed as accurate by SA MP Iain Evans [MP for Davenport electorate] who in a telephone conversation advised me that the NCA bombing was an event of prior to his first being elected as an MP in the December 1993 SA state election [when I was confined to a jail cell with Catanzariti].
The instruction to whoever prepared the NCA Freedom of Information release to avoid the release of the P. J. lamb NCA letter of 28 January 1998 or any reference to my communication with the NCA, came from somewhere and equates to an instruction to corrupt the records of the NCAACC/ACIC.
P.J. Lamb in his letter claims that “The matters raised by you do not fit within the role of the National Crime Authority.” The NCA is tasked with investigating organised crime including their activities in South Australia and must include ‘Ndrangheta gang member Frank Carbone [& SA police ‘Ndrangheta employs] who were charged with corruption crimes & is said to “be inclined to destroy evidence, that he was prepared to stand over people and that he could contact “rogue” police”- ‘The Advertiser’ 20 January 1996 https://rjrbtsrupertsfirstnewspaper.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/16-carbone-slueth-20-jan-1996.jpg?w=665 Carbone’s LinkedIn website claims he work on the NCA bombing, implying he worked for the NCA. Carbone, his ‘Ndrangheta associates [Catanzariti & NCA bomber Pere], police who work for them, SA police, the NCA and P. J. Lamb all know that the NCA bombing was an event of 2 March 1992 and that the date has been changed. SA police refuse to confirm their verbal advise given in a telephone conversation, that the December 1993 jail cell conversation with Catanzariti could not be relevant because it was before the 2 March 1994 Adelaide bombing of the NCA. There refuse to allow me to provide a statement on that December 1993 conversation.
P.J. Lamb’s claim that “matters raised by you [me] do not fit within the role of the National Crime Authority.” is false and intended to further conceal issues of NCA incompetence, negligence and corruption. Bowen was acting within NCA policy when he accepted ‘Ndrangheta money then opened a package of unknown contents, with NCA lawyer Peter Wallis, that killed him. His last words, according to Peter Wallis, were “I hope this isn’t a bomb” – seconds later he was dead – the newspaper reporting of which was not included in the false records of newspapers [fake archives] version of the news with the false date of his murder.
These matters of fact are deliberate and carefully considered acts of corruption and are not a result of administration errors. The instructions to falsify NCA/ACC/ACIC records are Breaches of public trust and the cost to me [$300 for 150 pages of rubbish] and the distress caused by my resulting knowledge that the NCA is corrupt has improperly caused detriment to me and is corruption as defined by the National Anti Corruption Commission Act (2022)
The efforts to conceal ‘Ndrangheta (NCA bomber Pere and associates] motivation for the murder of Geoffrey Bowen {an embarrassment to the NCA who placed Geoffrey Bowen in danger and then failed to protect him] includes the participation of others, notably the South Australian police who were part of the joint SAPOL/NCA investigation into the ‘Ndrangheta murder of Geoffrey Bowen.
The NACC can easily see the corruption issues I have raised [both the Adelaide NCA bombing and the State Bank of SA bankruptcy related corruption and crimes concealed] could only happen with instructions to those who have participated in those efforts to conceal the facts of corruption, presumably with the expectation of receiving a benefit for themselves.
The unidentified author of correspondence from the NACC Intake and Triage must have known that his/her claims were false and they were doing what they considered to be what the NACC Commissioner wanted.
The fact that the NACC correspondence [attached as file ‘NACC reply 21 Sept 2022] has disappeared from my email ‘Inbox’ {I can ‘Copy and Paste’ from email but not email compose screen] certainly suggests that the NACC has a connection to my hacker of email and my computer – but, like the fake archives of newspapers leaving evidence of the falsification of the records, is imperfect.
This text has been sent to the NACC and to attorney general Mark Dreyfus.
The NACC has ignored my many requests to provide me with an email address to which I can send documentation and information, has no means to provide documents through their contact website and has not acknowledged what I have sent.
If the NACC and attorney general Mark Dreyfus truly believed that the NACC is appropriate and adequate and that the NACC “has not been able to identify a clear allegation of corrupt conduct as defined by the National Anti Corruption Act (2022) then they would be prepared to provide me with written, signed confirmation of their belief.
The Australian Anti Corruption Commission NACC and attorney general Mark Dreyfus are corrupt.
Your acknowledgement of delivery of this correspondence is requested and required.
Yours Sincerely, Roger J. Bates 25 September 2023
……….. The text below – email from the NACC dated 20 September 2023 first appeared on the 25 September 2023 when I was writing the in an email compose screen the correspondence above that has been sent to Australia’s federal attorney general Mark Dreyfus. This 20 September email replaced an email from the NAAC dated 21 September 2023 that disappeared hacked from my email ‘Inbox’ file. I had kept a copy that appears further blow – I can ‘Copy & Paste’ from my email but cannot ‘Copy & Paste’ to an email Compose screen to MS Office Word. The email dated 21 September 2023 that has disappeared hacked, appears below the replacement email dated 20 September 2023 The email dated 20 Sept 2023 [below] replacing the hacked email of 21 Sept has no reference to the National Crime Authority NCA that was in the NACC email of 21 Sept 2023
From: no-reply@argus.nacc.gov.au <no-reply@argus.nacc.gov.au>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 3:03 PM
To: @hotmail.com <@>
Subject: FOR INFORMATION: Requested copies of webform submissions [SEC=Official]
Dear Roger,
Thank you for contacting the National Anti-Corruption Commission. We acknowledge receipt of two webform submissions on 27 August and one on 2 September 2023, as well as phone calls on 28 August and 19 September. As requested, please find your webform submissions attached.
The information you have provided is still being considered according to the N_ational Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2022_ (the Act). We will assess whether there is a corruption issue within our jurisdiction and if so, whether and how we should deal with it and advise you accordingly.
We aim to complete the assessment within 90 days of receipt. Until then, we are unable to provide an update and we will only contact you if we require additional information.
Yours Sincerely,
Intake and Triage
……………
Below – The email that has disappeared hacked from my email files. It appears there is a connection between the Australian National Anti Corruption Commission and my hacker of many years who has previously hacked my email, posts to WordPress and my personal computer.
Response to Webform ID: 202382761749-5563 [SEC=Official]
no-reply@argus.nacc.gov.au
You
Dear Roger,
Thank you for contacting the National Anti-Corruption Commission (the Commission) on 27 August 2023.
From the information you have provided regarding the bombing of the National Crime Authority, the Commission has not been able to identify a clear allegation of corrupt conduct as defined by the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act (2022). As a result, the Commission is unable to take any further action in this matter.
While corrupt conduct can take many forms, the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act (2022) defines it to mean situations where:
- a public official does something that breaches the public trust (which means using official powers for an improper purpose)
- a public official abuses their office as a public official (which means using their position for the purpose of improperly gaining a benefit for themselves or improperly causing a detriment to someone else)
- a public official misuses information they have access to in their capacity as a public official, or
- any person (whether or not they are a public official) does something or tries to do something that might cause a public official to carry out their duties in a dishonest or biased way.
Further information on what is corruption can be found here https://www.nacc.gov.au/reporting-and-investigating-corruption/what-corrupt-conduct.
Should additional information become available to support an allegation of corrupt conduct, please provide it to us.
Yours sincerely,
Intake and Triage
…….
This post to WordPress has been directed to the attention of the National Anti Corruption Commission with a request that they acknowledge viewing it and all other information in posts to WordPress and that the NACC further specify exactly what information and documented evidence of corruption and crimes concealed I have provided is considered the work of the National Crime Authority [NCA since renamed the ACC then the ACIC] & had the NCA/ACC/ACIC claim responsibility for and is therefore exempt from any consideration for investigation by the NACC
Posts to WordPress is the only means by which appropriate/adequate contact can be made with the NAAC that refuses to provide an email address so that documents & information can be sent.
The 5 December 2023 correspondence from the NACC and my reply can be viewed at https://cdn.filestackcontent.com/Ir2telbbQQCk6hQ8EVip that is the text of correspondence to the attorney general Mark Dreyfus – the text of the 5 Dec 2023 NACC correspondence from an unidentified author sent from no-reply@argus.nacc.gov.au and my reply also appears below.
Request for review: Webform ID: 2023105101037-7145 [SEC=Official]
no-reply@argus.nacc.gov.au
You
Dear Roger,
Request for review: Webform ID: 2023105101037-7145
Thank you for your contact on 5 October 2023 requesting a review of a decision made by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (the Commission) and communicated to you on 21 September 2023. I note you have made additional webform submissions between 27 August 2023 and 27 September 2023 and for completeness, these were received on the following dates:
- Webform ID: 202382761749-5563 submitted 27 August 2023
- Webform ID: 2023827131236-4441 submitted 27 August 2023
- Webform ID: 20239210449-2377 submitted 2 September 2023
- Webform ID: 202392272317-9793 submitted 22 September 2023
- Webform ID: 202392692515-6160 submitted 26 September 2023
- Webform ID: 2023927997-1381 submitted 27 September 2023
I have reviewed the webform submissions you provided, and summarise your allegations as follows:
- Detective Sergeant Geoffrey Bowen was placed in danger by the National Crime Authority (NCA), being a victim of a bombing;
- the NCA acted to conceal the motivation for Detective Sergeant Bowen’s death to benefit NCA and the person responsible for the bombing;
- news media have altered the reported date of the bombing that killed Detective Sergeant Geoffrey Bowen from 2 March 1992 to 2 March 1994;
- the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) failed to prosecute the Directors of Pro Image Studios, due to unknown instructions not to proceed;
- your sworn testimony given under oath July 1991 and August 1994 regarding a relationship between William Turner of Pro-Image Studios and the State Bank of South Australia has been edited; and
- the State Bank of South Australia acted as a Ponzi scheme and gifted over 16 million dollars to Rothschild Australia Limited at the expense of Australian taxpayers and referenced SBSA V Rothschilds NSC Vic Supreme Court dated 10 August 1990.
You also raised concerns that the Commission has not reviewed several website links to documents and photographs you provided in your reports. Please note that I have reviewed the website links you provided 27 August 2023, 2 September 2023, 22 September 2023, 26 September 2023, website links and photographs you provided 27 September 2023 and 5 October 2023.
I have reviewed the information you have provided to my satisfaction and believe the correct assessment has been made, and the Commission remains of the view that it was not possible to identify clear and distinct allegations of corrupt conduct sufficient to raise a corruption issue capable of investigation. This is based on how your report aligns with the definitions and scope of the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act (2022) (the Act).
In accordance with the Act, there is minimum essential information you must provide in a report to the Commission, and we require a succinct outline of the alleged conduct and why you think it is corrupt conduct.
The Commission also notes the significant amount of time that has passed since each incident has occurred. Even if the elements of corrupt conduct were present in your report, any investigation would be greatly hindered due to the matters being more than 15 years old. I also note the State Bank of South Australia and Pro-Image are no longer operating businesses and would not be within the jurisdiction of the Commission.
Ultimately, the NACC does not have to consider or respond to every referral it receives. The Commissioner can also decide not to take any action in relation to a referral.
We note you have already received a response from the Commission providing information about what constitutes corrupt conduct and the agencies and public officials that are within the Commissions jurisdiction. I won’t provide further information about this here, however if you would like to read more about this you can access information on our website, https://www.nacc.gov.au/reporting-and-investigating-corruption/what-corrupt-conduct
Further information about the service you can expect from us and reviews of decisions can be found in our Service Charter.
Yours sincerely,
General Manager, Corruption Prevention, Education and Evaluation
………….
My reply
A response to the NACC
A response to the NACC
The corruption of the NACC & att. gen Dreyfus confirmed
Evasions, misrepresentations & evidence ignored – NACC summarisation response 4 December 2023 – rewriting my complaint
To Australians involved with and an interest in Australian corruption concealed
Fraud – To receive a benefit or avoid an obligation by the use of deceit. Fraud is commonly understood as dishonesty calculated for advantage. A fraud is something or someone that deceives people in a way that is illegal or dishonest. Fraud is corruption.
The Australian National Anti Corruption Commission is corrupt. It pretends to be the authority accepting complaints on Australia’s corruption while it makes lodging a complaint as difficult as possible –
: it has no email address to send documented evidence of corruption – documents and information has been sent via filestack.com and WordPress posts
: it avoids any acknowledgement of evidence of corruption and crimes that has been sent to it by other means (filesatckcontent.com references) – it does not make any specific reference to any documents
: it deliberately makes telephone contact impossible – the NACC employee’s voice is too faint to comprehend what is said – the conversation presumably recorded will confirm that fact. The NACC makes no mention of my repeated requests for a NACC email address to which documents can be sent as attachments.
It should be possible to assume that the unnamed authors of NACC email correspondence, unsigned with no NACC letterhead from the unnamed General Manager, Corruption Prevention, Education and Evaluation and Intake and Triage sent from no-reply@argus.nacc.gov.au are capable of the most basic reading and comprehension of complaints.
Claims of NACC employees not being able to understand issues of corruption brought to their attention must certainly be false.
The manner of their summarizing correspondence they have received, removing from consideration the most obvious and easily verified as accurate issues of corruption for which they have had evidence provided, indicates the correspondence has been understood and an intention to avoid acknowledging the facts of corruption apparent from the documents provided.
Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC formerly named ASC) corruption
ASC/ASIC receives very little consideration in the NACC summarized version of my complaint. The ASIC letter I received dated 4 March 2015 from an unidentified author provides very little information, acknowledges nothing improper and advises that it refuses to engage in any further communication with me after stating that Pro Image Studios was deregistered on 19 December 2014. That letter made available to NACC can be viewed at https://cdn.filestackcontent.com/SgazbYlTSyagkR3X6dxy
In the court process of allowing bankrupt Pro Image Studios to issues shares – overturning a previous judgement preventing the issuing of shares, for which the court file has been “lost” (or stolen) & replaced by ASC/ASIC & banks seeking to retrieve tens of millions of dollars owed by Pro Image Studios: if the replacement court file was identical to the original “lost”/stolen file the result would be the same unwanted judgement preventing the issuing of shares – ASC/ASIC has participated in a fraud.
The April 1991 court judgement allowing Pro Image Studios to issue shares Pro-Image Studios v. Commonwealth Bank of Australia can be viewed at https://cdn.filestackcontent.com/c8xkFyfNRDy7tjbTkukG
Why is ASC/ASIC involved in this process of a share issue for a company, Pro Image Studios, for which its directors were to be prosecuted for fraud over $20 million the evidence of which was straight forward, but then had ASC/ASIC decide not proceed with their prosecution? Pro Image Studios and director William Turner’s debts to and ownership of questionable assets with the State Bank of South Australia (SBSA February 1991 bankruptcy debts still concealed in 2023) through its ‘Off Balance Sheet’ entity ‘Kabani’ risked being publicly exposed if ASC prosecutions of Pro Image Studios directors were to proceed.
ASC must have been aware of the 1987/1988 crimes of Pro Image Studios concerning $20 million when this April 1991 issuing of shares to the questionable value of $46,342,199 occurred. ASIC (the new name of ASC) must have been aware of ASC’s involvement in the bankrupt Pro Image Studios issuing of shares long before 19 December 2014 deregistration of Pro Image Studios.
A 1995 speech by ASIC’s Derek Parker with ref. to Pro Image Studios alleging negligence & breaches of directors’ duties of Pro Image Studios’ directors can be viewed at
https://cdn.filestackcontent.com/bwtSUQQT5urkPVvoIoK5%201995
“Charges have been laid against a number of directors of Pro Image Studios, alleging negligence and breaches of the director’s duties in that a profit of almost $20 million was recorded for the 1987/88 financial year when in fact a loss of approximately $2 million was disclosed in the management accounts: dividends of almost $7 million were paid out by the company.”
Newspaper articles reporting of Pro Image Studios director William Turner being charged with crimes then crimes being dropped have been erased from records of newspapers published that are fake archives easily confirmed as such by the NACC. ASC media releases referring to William Turner being charged and the charges being dropped can be viewed at https://cdn.filestackcontent.com/TltYbsTwTJuqg3C20x1q 27 Sept 1993
https://cdn.filestackcontent.com/AkFLn8YzSHmPNDQMpvNX 10 Nov 1995
ASC/ASIC’s consuming taxpayer resources on unexplained processes contrary to what taxpayers should reasonably expect from ASC/ASIC, must be on instruction from an unidentified source, for which it must be assumed ASC/ASIC expected to receive a benefit.
The banks seeking to overturn a previous judgement would only do so expecting to receive money in exchange for shares in a bankrupt Pro Image Studios company.
ASC/ASIC refuse to answer simple questions on what had occurred with Pro Image Studios. The obvious question of what happened to the ownership of the seemingly worthless shares in the bankrupt Pro Image Studios shares with a value of $46,342,199 remains unanswered. Australia’s National Anti Corruption Commission NACC could, if it were a serious corruption complaint investigation authority, ask questions of ASIC/ASC and insist that they be answered. The NACC instead, like ASIC and Australia’s federal attorney general Mark Dreyfus is intent on concealing Australia’s corruption and crimes concealed.
The NACC’s obvious evasions misrepresenting my complaints of corruption, ignoring most of the information and documents I have provided, must certainly be a consequence of instructions from an unidentified source that seems likely to be attorney general Mark Dreyfus MP. Any such instruction to avoid acknowledging a complaint of corruption is itself corruption as defined by the Australia’s National Anti Corruption Commission NACC.
The NACC’s unnamed General Manager, Corruption Prevention, Education and Evaluation – the Commission himself appears want to avoid any acknowledgement of information provided to the NACC – writes
“In accordance with the Act, there is minimum essential information you must provide in a report to the Commission, and we require a succinct outline of the alleged conduct and why you think it is corrupt conduct.
The Commission also notes the significant amount of time that has passed since each incident has occurred. Even if the elements of corrupt conduct were present in your report, any investigation would be greatly hindered due to the matters being more than 15 years old. I also note the State Bank of South Australia and Pro-Image are no longer operating businesses and would not be within the jurisdiction of the Commission.
Ultimately, the NACC does not have to consider or respond to every referral it receives. The Commissioner can also decide not to take any action in relation to a referral.”
It is reasonable to assume that the unnamed NACC General Manager, Corruption Prevention, Education and Evaluation in his/her unsigned correspondence dated 4 December 2023 is capable of the most basic reading and comprehension of information and documentation provided to the NACC. If the author of NACC correspondence is incapable of understanding the obvious corruption issues I have raised the Commissioner himself and attorney general Mark Dreyfus should acknowledge that they are aware of this problem of comprehension. The NACC has never asked me any questions on the information that I have provided, even though I have invited it to do so.
The 5 December 2023 response from the NACC unnamed author states that too much time has elapsed to allow an investigation into the corruption I have disclosed. Australian news media has reported that attorney general Dreyfus has stated that corruption no matter how long in the past will be investigated. Dreyfus delayed establishing a national Anti Corruption Commission for many years despite since 2013 knowing of corruption issues I’ve raised that he has never acknowledged.
The authors of NACC correspondence undoubtedly understands that banks grant loans that are secured with assets that are greater in value than the loan. The Commonwealth Bank and the Bank of New Zealand BNZ seeking the retrieval of $46,342,199 from Pro Image Studios through the issuing of shares, would never have granted any loans to Pro Image Studios without the loans being secured by valuable assets. Pro Image Studios and director William Turner’s assets were jointly owned by the State Bank of South Australia SBSA through its wholly owned subsidiary Beneficial Finance BFC’s ‘Off Balance Sheet’ company ‘Kabani’ as described in WordPress post of https://rjrbtsrupertsfirstnewspaper.wordpress.com/2018/03/11/rupert-murdochs-fake-archives-of-newspapers-corrupt-journalism-and-billions-of-dollars-of-unaccounted-for-public-debt-updated/
The Commonwealth Bank and the Bank of New Zealand BNZ with the cooperation of ASC acted knowing that they could convert shares in the bankrupt Pro Image Studios to cash to the value the unpaid loans made to Pro Image Studios. The alternative being court litigation claiming the amount of unpaid loans to Pro Image Studios, from the State Bank of South Australia that would have exposed the details of SBSA’s corruption and crimes concealed concerning its illegal accounting and corrupt, hugely inflated valuation of $100 million for ‘Off Balance Sheet’ company ‘Kabani’. The State Bank of SA was guaranteed by South Australian taxpayers meaning bad debt loans to Pro Image Studios were secure and valuable assets owned by Turner and Pro Image became valuable assets that don’t exist secretly owned by South Australian taxpayers kept within the South Australian Assets Management Corporation SAAMC. The State Bank of SA’s ‘Off Balance Sheet’ company Kabani only had any value in the imagination of the bank’s management.
https://cdn.filestackcontent.com/Nf7xP5QwyGmInSzumhwL is a copy of the 2 October 1990 ‘The Advertiser’ newspaper page 2 article headlined “Bank silent on mystery firm” reporting of the $100 million valuation of SBSA’s ‘Off Balance Sheet’ company ‘Kabani’ and is the first ref. to SBSA (through Beneficial Finance Corporation) having any ‘Off Balance Sheet’ company.
One ‘Off Balance Sheet’ company became many OBS companies as reported in newspaper articles that have since been erased from records of newspapers published that are fake archives within Australia’s state public libraries.
The State Bank of SA’s ‘Off Balance Sheet’ entities were never heard of again. News media, including the taxpayer funded Australian Broadcasting Corporation ABC, have acted on instructions from an unidentified source (corruption as defined by the NACC) to avoid informing Australian taxpayers of crimes they’ve been victims of, and to broadcast and publish fake news to deceive taxpayers. News media know of Australia’s corruption and participate in its concealment.
A Royal Commission of inquiry into the State Bank of SA was promised to be established after which government legislated a change of its proposed terms of reference preventing public disclosure of SBSA bankruptcy debt details, with the SA Auditor General to instead write a secret never publicly disclosed report. State Bank of SA directors at their last meeting of the bord of directors voted to grant themselves unlimited pubic funding for legal representation. The Royal Commission into the State Bank of SA lasted several years costing $50 million (more recently reported as $36 million) and disclosed nothing of how the State Bank became a multi-billion dollar liability from being a billion dollar asset. Public owned assets – electricity generation and distribution (the Electricity Trust of SA ETSA), water assets (Engineering and Water Supply E & WS) Lottery’s Commission to name a few) were sold to partly pay the sates debt. The states assets – building, roads, land & parks – were given a value to exist within the South Australian Assets Management Corporation SAAMC so as to give the appearance that the state was not bankrupt.
Information within the South Australian Treasury SA Assets Management Corporation SAAMC, including my employment record for which I have paid for a Freedom of Information release that has never been made, will confirm as accurate the information above referring to the concealed public debt created by the bankruptcy of the State Bank of South Australia. The information is relevant to the corruption of Australian federal law enforcement authorities within the jurisdiction of and available to the National Anti Corruption Commission NACC for investigation.
The NACC could easily investigate the corruption issues I have raised simply looking at the Australian state libraries records of newspapers published – and acknowledging the evidence of them being fake archives – and asking those involved in all the matters of corruption I have disclosed what they can recall of these events that have cost billions of dollars & consumed taxpayer’s assets to conceal. Politicians know of the facts of Australia’s corruption & crimes concealed but would reveal the facts of Australia’s corruption if the NACC required that they do so, rather than risk later exposer as having given false information to the NACC.
The NACC’s claim
“The Commission also notes the significant amount of time that has passed since each incident has occurred. Even if the elements of corrupt conduct were present in your report, any investigation would be greatly hindered due to the matters being more than 15 years old. I also note the State Bank of South Australia and Pro-Image are no longer operating businesses and would not be within the jurisdiction of the Commission.”
is dishonest and misleading. The evidence of corruption still exists. News media has reported attorney general stating that corruption no matter how far in the past will be investigated. SBSA and Pro-Image no longer existing as operating businesses does not prevent the NACC investigating the still existing records of their existence. The Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC since renamed from ASC) is certainly within the jurisdiction of the NACC. ASIC’s continued concealment of corruption is undoubtedly corruption.
The NACC should be aware of and has read WordPress posts
https://rjrbtsrupertsfirstnewspaper.wordpress.com/2023/09/27/the-corruption-of-the-australian-commonwealth-ombudsman/ with correspondence from the Australian Commonwealth Ombudsman that includes a document, order 797 an order by decree, said to be signed by then Health Minister Greg Hunt, referring to Australians not in Australia must pay a Mediacare Levy for 5 years after leaving Australia – a fee for no service, being unable to claim any Medicare benefits. The office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman knows that the legislation by decree of Health Minister Greg Hunt Order 797 does not exist. Claims that it does are fraudulent. The signature on the document is not that of Greg Hunt. The question of ‘Who signed that document falsely claiming to be Greg Hunt?’ has never been answered. It is corruption that the NACC can and should investigate.
Since my attempts to lodge complaints of Australia’s corruption with the NACC problems with the Commonwealth Bank has developed, with the bank not able to send me a replacement ATM/Debit card to replace an expired card and threatening to limit/suspend my access to my bank account over non compliance with demands related to ‘know your customer’ requirements. The bank has since ended having any correspondence without my complaints being resolved. The Australian Financial Complaints Authority AFCA has been too busy to assist me with the Commonwealth Bank problem and has apologised for a computer error closing the AFCA complaint in error.
Comm Bank sent 17 Oct 2023.pdf (271 KB)
Comm Bank AFCA 14 Oct 2023.pdf (130 KB)
Comm Bank Delaney 13 Oct 2023.pdf (200 KB)
Comm Bank to CB 12 Oct 2021.pdf (147 KB)
File ‘AFCA Mistake reply’ see page 2
The NACC claim that it “has not been able to identify a clear allegation of corrupt conduct as defined by the National Anti Corruption Act (2022) is obviously false. If the NACC and attorney general believed that to be true, they would be prepared to provide me with written, signed confirmation of their belief.
The NACC correspondence states that it requires “a succinct outline of the alleged conduct and why you think it is corrupt conduct.” while evading the evidence of fraud and benefits derived from deception including that related to what must be considered to be ASC/ASIC and others conspiring to pervert the course of justice on instruction from an unidentified source intent on preventing public disclosure of incompetence, negligence and corruption of governments, politicians, law enforcement and news media. The National Anti Crime Commission NACC acting on instructions from an unidentified source – possibly attorney general Dreyfus who appointed the NACC Commissioner and staff – is itself corrupt as defined by the text on the NACC websites referring to the National Anti Corruption Act (2022).
The information in this correspondence can be confirmed by a competent and capable investigator as true and correct.
Roger J. Bates 12 December 2023
………
Below – A response to the NACC
The corruption of the NACC & att. gen Dreyfus confirmed
Evasions, misrepresentations & evidence ignored – NACC summarisation response 4 December 2023 – rewriting my complaint
To Australians involved with and an interest in Australian corruption concealed
Fraud – To receive a benefit or avoid an obligation by the use of deceit. Fraud is commonly understood as dishonesty calculated for advantage. A fraud is something or someone that deceives people in a way that is illegal or dishonest. Fraud is corruption.
The Australian National Anti Corruption Commission is corrupt. It pretends to be the authority accepting complaints on Australia’s corruption while it makes lodging a complaint as difficult as possible –
: it has no email address to send documented evidence of corruption – documents and information has been sent via filestack.com and WordPress posts
: it avoids any acknowledgement of evidence of corruption and crimes that has been sent to it by other means (filesatckcontent.com references) – it does not make any specific reference to any documents
: it deliberately makes telephone contact impossible – the NACC employee’s voice is too faint to comprehend what is said – the conversation presumably recorded will confirm that fact. The NACC makes no mention of my repeated requests for a NACC email address to which documents can be sent as attachments.
It should be possible to assume that the unnamed authors of NACC email correspondence, unsigned with no NACC letterhead from the unnamed General Manager, Corruption Prevention, Education and Evaluation and Intake and Triage sent from no-reply@argus.nacc.gov.au are capable of the most basic reading and comprehension of complaints.
Claims of NACC employees not being able to understand issues of corruption brought to their attention must certainly be false.
The manner of their summarizing correspondence they have received, removing from consideration the most obvious and easily verified as accurate issues of corruption for which they have had evidence provided, indicates the correspondence has been understood and an intention to avoid acknowledging the facts of corruption apparent from the documents provided.
Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC formerly named ASC) corruption
ASC/ASIC receives very little consideration in the NACC summarized version of my complaint. The ASIC letter I received dated 4 March 2015 from an unidentified author provides very little information, acknowledges nothing improper and advises that it refuses to engage in any further communication with me after stating that Pro Image Studios was deregistered on 19 December 2014. That letter made available to NACC can be viewed at https://cdn.filestackcontent.com/SgazbYlTSyagkR3X6dxy
In the court process of allowing bankrupt Pro Image Studios to issues shares – overturning a previous judgement preventing the issuing of shares, for which the court file has been “lost” (or stolen) & replaced by ASC/ASIC & banks seeking to retrieve tens of millions of dollars owed by Pro Image Studios: if the replacement court file was identical to the original “lost”/stolen file the result would be the same unwanted judgement preventing the issuing of shares – ASC/ASIC has participated in a fraud.
The April 1991 court judgement allowing Pro Image Studios to issue shares Pro-Image Studios v. Commonwealth Bank of Australia can be viewed at https://cdn.filestackcontent.com/c8xkFyfNRDy7tjbTkukG
Why is ASC/ASIC involved in this process of a share issue for a company, Pro Image Studios, for which its directors were to be prosecuted for fraud over $20 million the evidence of which was straight forward, but then had ASC/ASIC decide not proceed with their prosecution? Pro Image Studios and director William Turner’s debts to and ownership of questionable assets with the State Bank of South Australia (SBSA February 1991 bankruptcy debts still concealed in 2023) through its ‘Off Balance Sheet’ entity ‘Kabani’ risked being publicly exposed if ASC prosecutions of Pro Image Studios directors were to proceed.
ASC must have been aware of the 1987/1988 crimes of Pro Image Studios concerning $20 million when this April 1991 issuing of shares to the questionable value of $46,342,199 occurred. ASIC (the new name of ASC) must have been aware of ASC’s involvement in the bankrupt Pro Image Studios issuing of shares long before 19 December 2014 deregistration of Pro Image Studios.
A 1995 speech by ASIC’s Derek Parker with ref. to Pro Image Studios alleging negligence & breaches of directors’ duties of Pro Image Studios’ directors can be viewed at
https://cdn.filestackcontent.com/bwtSUQQT5urkPVvoIoK5%201995
“Charges have been laid against a number of directors of Pro Image Studios, alleging negligence and breaches of the director’s duties in that a profit of almost $20 million was recorded for the 1987/88 financial year when in fact a loss of approximately $2 million was disclosed in the management accounts: dividends of almost $7 million were paid out by the company.”
Newspaper articles reporting of Pro Image Studios director William Turner being charged with crimes then crimes being dropped have been erased from records of newspapers published that are fake archives easily confirmed as such by the NACC. ASC media releases referring to William Turner being charged and the charges being dropped can be viewed at https://cdn.filestackcontent.com/TltYbsTwTJuqg3C20x1q 27 Sept 1993
https://cdn.filestackcontent.com/AkFLn8YzSHmPNDQMpvNX 10 Nov 1995
ASC/ASIC’s consuming taxpayer resources on unexplained processes contrary to what taxpayers should reasonably expect from ASC/ASIC, must be on instruction from an unidentified source, for which it must be assumed ASC/ASIC expected to receive a benefit.
The banks seeking to overturn a previous judgement would only do so expecting to receive money in exchange for shares in a bankrupt Pro Image Studios company.
ASC/ASIC refuse to answer simple questions on what had occurred with Pro Image Studios. The obvious question of what happened to the ownership of the seemingly worthless shares in the bankrupt Pro Image Studios shares with a value of $46,342,199 remains unanswered. Australia’s National Anti Corruption Commission NACC could, if it were a serious corruption complaint investigation authority, ask questions of ASIC/ASC and insist that they be answered. The NACC instead, like ASIC and Australia’s federal attorney general Mark Dreyfus is intent on concealing Australia’s corruption and crimes concealed.
The NACC’s obvious evasions misrepresenting my complaints of corruption, ignoring most of the information and documents I have provided, must certainly be a consequence of instructions from an unidentified source that seems likely to be attorney general Mark Dreyfus MP. Any such instruction to avoid acknowledging a complaint of corruption is itself corruption as defined by the Australia’s National Anti Corruption Commission NACC.
The NACC’s unnamed General Manager, Corruption Prevention, Education and Evaluation – the Commission himself appears want to avoid any acknowledgement of information provided to the NACC – writes
“In accordance with the Act, there is minimum essential information you must provide in a report to the Commission, and we require a succinct outline of the alleged conduct and why you think it is corrupt conduct.
The Commission also notes the significant amount of time that has passed since each incident has occurred. Even if the elements of corrupt conduct were present in your report, any investigation would be greatly hindered due to the matters being more than 15 years old. I also note the State Bank of South Australia and Pro-Image are no longer operating businesses and would not be within the jurisdiction of the Commission.
Ultimately, the NACC does not have to consider or respond to every referral it receives. The Commissioner can also decide not to take any action in relation to a referral.”
It is reasonable to assume that the unnamed NACC General Manager, Corruption Prevention, Education and Evaluation in his/her unsigned correspondence dated 4 December 2023 is capable of the most basic reading and comprehension of information and documentation provided to the NACC. If the author of NACC correspondence is incapable of understanding the obvious corruption issues I have raised the Commissioner himself and attorney general Mark Dreyfus should acknowledge that they are aware of this problem of comprehension. The NACC has never asked me any questions on the information that I have provided, even though I have invited it to do so.
The 5 December 2023 response from the NACC unnamed author states that too much time has elapsed to allow an investigation into the corruption I have disclosed. Australian news media has reported that attorney general Dreyfus has stated that corruption no matter how long in the past will be investigated. Dreyfus delayed establishing a national Anti Corruption Commission for many years despite since 2013 knowing of corruption issues I’ve raised that he has never acknowledged.
The authors of NACC correspondence undoubtedly understands that banks grant loans that are secured with assets that are greater in value than the loan. The Commonwealth Bank and the Bank of New Zealand BNZ seeking the retrieval of $46,342,199 from Pro Image Studios through the issuing of shares, would never have granted any loans to Pro Image Studios without the loans being secured by valuable assets. Pro Image Studios and director William Turner’s assets were jointly owned by the State Bank of South Australia SBSA through its wholly owned subsidiary Beneficial Finance BFC’s ‘Off Balance Sheet’ company ‘Kabani’ as described in WordPress post of https://rjrbtsrupertsfirstnewspaper.wordpress.com/2018/03/11/rupert-murdochs-fake-archives-of-newspapers-corrupt-journalism-and-billions-of-dollars-of-unaccounted-for-public-debt-updated/
The Commonwealth Bank and the Bank of New Zealand BNZ with the cooperation of ASC acted knowing that they could convert shares in the bankrupt Pro Image Studios to cash to the value the unpaid loans made to Pro Image Studios. The alternative being court litigation claiming the amount of unpaid loans to Pro Image Studios, from the State Bank of South Australia that would have exposed the details of SBSA’s corruption and crimes concealed concerning its illegal accounting and corrupt, hugely inflated valuation of $100 million for ‘Off Balance Sheet’ company ‘Kabani’. The State Bank of SA was guaranteed by South Australian taxpayers meaning bad debt loans to Pro Image Studios were secure and valuable assets owned by Turner and Pro Image became valuable assets that don’t exist secretly owned by South Australian taxpayers kept within the South Australian Assets Management Corporation SAAMC. The State Bank of SA’s ‘Off Balance Sheet’ company Kabani only had any value in the imagination of the bank’s management.
https://cdn.filestackcontent.com/Nf7xP5QwyGmInSzumhwL is a copy of the 2 October 1990 ‘The Advertiser’ newspaper page 2 article headlined “Bank silent on mystery firm” reporting of the $100 million valuation of SBSA’s ‘Off Balance Sheet’ company ‘Kabani’ and is the first ref. to SBSA (through Beneficial Finance Corporation) having any ‘Off Balance Sheet’ company.
One ‘Off Balance Sheet’ company became many OBS companies as reported in newspaper articles that have since been erased from records of newspapers published that are fake archives within Australia’s state public libraries.
The State Bank of SA’s ‘Off Balance Sheet’ entities were never heard of again. News media, including the taxpayer funded Australian Broadcasting Corporation ABC, have acted on instructions from an unidentified source (corruption as defined by the NACC) to avoid informing Australian taxpayers of crimes they’ve been victims of, and to broadcast and publish fake news to deceive taxpayers. News media know of Australia’s corruption and participate in its concealment.
A Royal Commission of inquiry into the State Bank of SA was promised to be established after which government legislated a change of its proposed terms of reference preventing public disclosure of SBSA bankruptcy debt details, with the SA Auditor General to instead write a secret never publicly disclosed report. State Bank of SA directors at their last meeting of the bord of directors voted to grant themselves unlimited pubic funding for legal representation. The Royal Commission into the State Bank of SA lasted several years costing $50 million (more recently reported as $36 million) and disclosed nothing of how the State Bank became a multi-billion dollar liability from being a billion dollar asset. Public owned assets – electricity generation and distribution (the Electricity Trust of SA ETSA), water assets (Engineering and Water Supply E & WS) Lottery’s Commission to name a few) were sold to partly pay the sates debt. The states assets – building, roads, land & parks – were given a value to exist within the South Australian Assets Management Corporation SAAMC so as to give the appearance that the state was not bankrupt.
Information within the South Australian Treasury SA Assets Management Corporation SAAMC, including my employment record for which I have paid for a Freedom of Information release that has never been made, will confirm as accurate the information above referring to the concealed public debt created by the bankruptcy of the State Bank of South Australia. The information is relevant to the corruption of Australian federal law enforcement authorities within the jurisdiction of and available to the National Anti Corruption Commission NACC for investigation.
The NACC could easily investigate the corruption issues I have raised simply looking at the Australian state libraries records of newspapers published – and acknowledging the evidence of them being fake archives – and asking those involved in all the matters of corruption I have disclosed what they can recall of these events that have cost billions of dollars & consumed taxpayer’s assets to conceal. Politicians know of the facts of Australia’s corruption & crimes concealed but would reveal the facts of Australia’s corruption if the NACC required that they do so, rather than risk later exposer as having given false information to the NACC.
The NACC’s claim
“The Commission also notes the significant amount of time that has passed since each incident has occurred. Even if the elements of corrupt conduct were present in your report, any investigation would be greatly hindered due to the matters being more than 15 years old. I also note the State Bank of South Australia and Pro-Image are no longer operating businesses and would not be within the jurisdiction of the Commission.”
is dishonest and misleading. The evidence of corruption still exists. News media has reported attorney general stating that corruption no matter how far in the past will be investigated. SBSA and Pro-Image no longer existing as operating businesses does not prevent the NACC investigating the still existing records of their existence. The Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC since renamed from ASC) is certainly within the jurisdiction of the NACC. ASIC’s continued concealment of corruption is undoubtedly corruption.
The NACC should be aware of and has read WordPress posts
https://rjrbtsrupertsfirstnewspaper.wordpress.com/2023/09/27/the-corruption-of-the-australian-commonwealth-ombudsman/ with correspondence from the Australian Commonwealth Ombudsman that includes a document, order 797 an order by decree, said to be signed by then Health Minister Greg Hunt, referring to Australians not in Australia must pay a Mediacare Levy for 5 years after leaving Australia – a fee for no service, being unable to claim any Medicare benefits. The office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman knows that the legislation by decree of Health Minister Greg Hunt Order 797 does not exist. Claims that it does are fraudulent. The signature on the document is not that of Greg Hunt. The question of ‘Who signed that document falsely claiming to be Greg Hunt?’ has never been answered. It is corruption that the NACC can and should investigate.
Since my attempts to lodge complaints of Australia’s corruption with the NACC problems with the Commonwealth Bank has developed, with the bank not able to send me a replacement ATM/Debit card to replace an expired card and threatening to limit/suspend my access to my bank account over non compliance with demands related to ‘know your customer’ requirements. The bank has since ended having any correspondence without my complaints being resolved. The Australian Financial Complaints Authority AFCA has been too busy to assist me with the Commonwealth Bank problem and has apologised for a computer error closing the AFCA complaint in error.
Comm Bank sent 17 Oct 2023.pdf (271 KB)
Comm Bank AFCA 14 Oct 2023.pdf (130 KB)
Comm Bank Delaney 13 Oct 2023.pdf (200 KB)
Comm Bank to CB 12 Oct 2021.pdf (147 KB)
File ‘AFCA Mistake reply’ see page 2
The NACC claim that it “has not been able to identify a clear allegation of corrupt conduct as defined by the National Anti Corruption Act (2022) is obviously false. If the NACC and attorney general believed that to be true, they would be prepared to provide me with written, signed confirmation of their belief.
The NACC correspondence states that it requires “a succinct outline of the alleged conduct and why you think it is corrupt conduct.” while evading the evidence of fraud and benefits derived from deception including that related to what must be considered to be ASC/ASIC and others conspiring to pervert the course of justice on instruction from an unidentified source intent on preventing public disclosure of incompetence, negligence and corruption of governments, politicians, law enforcement and news media. The National Anti Crime Commission NACC acting on instructions from an unidentified source – possibly attorney general Dreyfus who appointed the NACC Commissioner and staff – is itself corrupt as defined by the text on the NACC websites referring to the National Anti Corruption Act (2022).
The information in this correspondence can be confirmed by a competent and capable investigator as true and correct.
Roger J. Bates 12 December 2023
![Investigation officer for the Australian Commonwealth Ombudsman states in her letter dated 18 April 2018 that
“You said that you departed Australia prior to 2012. You said you were in Thailand for 1 Month in 2007 and you were absent from Australia for 3 months in 2004. You attach photocopies of your passport for this period”
-- I had my passport stolen in 2008 while in Thailand. A new passport was issued in 2008 via the Australian Embassy in Bangkok. I provided The office of the Australian Commonwealth Ombudsman with a copy of pages of my passport showing my Thailand visas 2008 to 2012* [& departures & returns in 2010 [in Australia for 3 months] and 2012 [in Australia for 4 months] Thai visas for 2012 to 2017 previously provided. I could not provide copies of pages of my passport for before 2008 when a new passport was issues via the Australian Embassy in Bangkok.
and
“The material you provided does not prove you departed Australia prior to 23 October 2012 to live overseas. As you were overseas for a short period of time, the 5 year time period did not begin. –
- What I provided does prove I was absent from Australia prior to 23 October 2012. The Ombudsman knows that the claim that it doesn’t is false. The period of my absence from Australia 2007 to 2012 is 5 years, the same as 2012 to 2017 [not a “short time”] which the period for which I was claiming a refund for the 2% Medicare fee for no service for being ineligible to claim any Medicare benefits.
and
“DHS advised our Office that according to the International Movement Record (IMR), owned by the Department of Home Affairs, you departed Australia to reside overseas on 23 October 2012. The evidence you provided does not contradict this.”
Fiona Annetts Investigation officer for the office of Australian Commonwealth Ombudsman could see from what I had provided that the alleged claim of the International Movement Record (IMR) was false & should if accurate show my absence from Australia since 2007.](https://rjrbtsrupertsfirstnewspaper.files.wordpress.com/2023/09/omb-18-apr-2018-2.jpg)
Rupert Murdoch crimes Australia 
