The corruption of the Australian Commonwealth Ombudsman

The concealment of the corruption of the office of the Department for Human Services DHS

Claims of a change of law regarding the Medicare 2% Levy – order by decree ‘Order 797’ – A fee for no service. There is no ‘Order 797’ and the Commonwealth Ombudsman knows that it does not exist.

Correspondence from the office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman and the Dept for Human Services that administrates imposition of the 2% Levy appears below

The office of the Australian Commonwealth Ombudsman is corrupt and understands that claims made in its correspondence to me are false. The Commonwealth Ombudsman conceals the corruption of the Minister for Department for Human Services [Michael Keenan at that time] and the Minister for Health [Greg Hunt MP at that time] and the Dept for Homeland Security [Peter Dutton at that time]

In September 2017 I returned to Australia to lodge an application for a Medicare Entitlement Statement (MES) said to be required by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) to process a refund for a 2% Medicare Levy (of my income) for membership of Australia’s Medicare, for (a part) of the time I was absent from Australia and ineligible to claim any refund for medical expenses.

Within 2 weeks of my September 2017 lodgment of the application for Medicare Entitlement Statement (MES) it is said that the Minister for Health Greg Hunt MP legislated an order by decree, ‘Order 797’, requiring Australian citizens absent from Australia to pay the 2% Medicare Levy for 5 years after leaving Australia & lose their Medicare membership after accumulating 5 years absence from Australia. The 5 years is said not to restart on any returns to Australia after first departing from Australia.

The change in the law is said to alleviate a problem of the previous 25 years since 1992, when concerns were raised on behalf of Australian missionaries who could not prove they were permanent residents of Australia after returning from overseas and were denied any benefits of Medicare membership.

They claims made by the office of Administrative Services and the Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman in correspondence appearing below are absurd and intended to be seen as such by me. The claims made by the office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman are ridiculous and proven to be false by the documents that I have provided.

The office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman knows that their claims supporting the corruption of the office of Human Services that administrate the imposition of the 2% Medicare Levy, are false.

The corruption is not a consequence of any administration errors. It must be assumed that those who are participants in perpetrating the corrupt administration of their offices and those who conceal the corruption on their behalf, do so in the expectation of receiving a benefit.

Medicare is a fee for no service.

Below – Correspondence dated 18 April 2018 from Fiona Annetts Invetsigation officer for the Australia Commonwelth Ombudsman

Investigation officer for the Australian Commonwealth Ombudsman states in her letter dated 18 April 2018 that

“You said that you departed Australia prior to 2012. You said you were in Thailand for 1 Month in 2007 and you were absent from Australia for 3 months in 2004. You attach photocopies of your passport for this period”  

— I had my passport stolen in 2008 while in Thailand.  A new passport was issued in 2008 via the Australian Embassy in Bangkok. I provided The office of the Australian Commonwealth Ombudsman with a copy of pages of my passport showing my Thailand visas 2008 to 2012* [& departures & returns in 2010  [in Australia for 3 months] and 2012 [in Australia for 4 months] Thai visas for 2012 to 2017 previously provided. I could not provide copies of pages of my passport for before 2008 when a new passport was issues via the Australian Embassy in Bangkok.

and

“The material you provided does not prove you departed Australia prior to 23 October 2012 to live overseas. As you were overseas for a short period of time, the 5 year time period did not begin. –

– What I provided does prove I was absent from Australia prior to 23 October 2012. The Ombudsman knows that the claim that it doesn’t is false. The period of my absence from Australia 2007 to 2012 is 5 years, the same as 2012 to 2017 [not a “short time”] which the period for which I was claiming a refund for the 2% Medicare fee for no service for being ineligible to claim  any Medicare benefits.

  and

“DHS advised our Office that according to the International Movement Record (IMR), owned by the Department of Home Affairs, you departed Australia to reside overseas on 23 October 2012. The evidence you provided does not contradict this.”

Fiona Annetts Investigation officer for the office of Australian Commonwealth Ombudsman could see from what I had provided that the alleged claim of the International Movement Record (IMR) was false & should if accurate show my absence from Australia since 2007.

Attachments to a letter from the Commonwealth Ombudsman including an document siad to signed by Health Minister Greg Hunt & absurd ‘Statement of Reasons’ for the change in the law, appear further below.

The information and documentation within this post has been brought to the attention of Australian National Anti Corruption Commission NACC

The corruption of Australia’s National Anti Corruption Commission and attorney general Mark Dreyfus

The corruption of the National Anti Corruption Commission and attorney general Mark Dreyfus

Evidence of the concealment of Australian corruption and crimes again evaded

Australian attorney general Mark Dreyfus & the National Anti Corruption Commission NACC evade acknowledging the evidence of corruption of Australia’s federal & state law enforcement, politicians [of both political parties] and news media including the taxpayer funded ABC.

                                          The text below has been sent to Australian attorney general Mark Dreyfus (and others) & the National Anti Crime Commission via this WordPress post, in response to their unsigned email from NACC Intake and Triage. Note the NACC email address cannot accept email sent to the NACC that refuses to provide an email address to send information and documentation.

I request that you, attorney general Dreyfus, acknowledge delivery of this correspondence & reply with a signed communication. The issues of Australian corruption are serious and deserve your personal attention.

The NACC reply of 21 September 2023 to my complaint has disappeared from my email ‘Inbox’ file. It is attached to this email as file ‘NACC reply 21 Sept 2023 XX’. I have only seen & read the text [Forwarded] below today 25 Sept 2023 for the first time.  I am unable to ‘Copy and Paste’ text to this Hotmail ‘Compose’ screen. I can only rewrite text that I have written to MicroSoft Office Word to an email compose screen  . It appears to be the work of my hacker. I also include the text rewritten below as the attached pdf file ‘Reply to NACC 25 Sept 2023’. 

NCA/ACC/ACIC crimes and corruption The corruption of the NCA Freedom of Information release

Letter from NCA P. J. Lamb dated 28 January 1998 https://rjrbtsrupertsfirstnewspaper.files.wordpress.com/2015.11.21-nca-lamb-28-jan-1998-nca-bomb1jpg?w=665

The Freedom of Information release made by the National Crime Authority [NCA – intended to provide me with confirmation of my telephone contact with the NCA in which I advised of a December 1993 jail cell conversation I had during which ‘Nrangheta crime gang member Saverio Catanzariti [NCA bomber’s “Lieutenant”] disclosed his gang’s motivation for the murder of Geoffrey Bowen] has no reference to letter I received from P. J. Lamb dated 28 January 1998 sent to me in January 1998 a few days after I had a telephone conversation with P. J. Lamb & disclosed to him details of that December 1993 jail cell conversation with Catanzariti.  There are indications that the conversation with Catanzariti was recorded as part of the investigation into the December 1992 Adelaide NCA bombing murder of Bowen.    P. J. Lamb knows that the Adelaide NCA bombing was an event of 2^nd March 1992 and that the date of Bowen’s murder was changed to 2^nd March 1994 [records of newspapers published have been altered to now be fake archives] – the first news media reference to the 2^nd March 1994 date was made in March 1997 in a newspaper article authored by Silva Kriven.  The true date of 2^nd March 1992 was in 1998 confirmed as accurate by SA MP Iain Evans [MP for Davenport electorate] who in a telephone conversation advised me that the NCA bombing was an event of prior to his first being elected as an MP in the December 1993 SA state election [when I was confined to a jail cell with Catanzariti].

The instruction to whoever prepared the NCA Freedom of Information release to avoid the release of the P. J. lamb NCA letter of 28 January 1998 or any reference to my communication with the NCA, came from somewhere and equates to an instruction to corrupt the records of the NCAACC/ACIC.

P.J. Lamb in his letter claims that “The matters raised by you do not fit within the role of the National Crime Authority.”    The NCA is tasked with investigating organised crime including their activities in South Australia and must include ‘Ndrangheta gang member Frank Carbone [& SA police ‘Ndrangheta employs] who were charged with corruption crimes & is said to “be inclined to destroy evidence, that he was prepared to stand over people and that he could contact “rogue” police”- ‘The Advertiser’ 20 January 1996  https://rjrbtsrupertsfirstnewspaper.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/16-carbone-slueth-20-jan-1996.jpg?w=665   Carbone’s LinkedIn website claims he work on the NCA bombing, implying he worked for the NCA.  Carbone, his ‘Ndrangheta associates [Catanzariti & NCA bomber Pere], police who work for them, SA police, the NCA and P. J. Lamb all know that the NCA bombing was an event of 2 March 1992 and that the date has been changed. SA police refuse to confirm their verbal advise given in a telephone conversation, that the December 1993 jail cell conversation with Catanzariti could not be relevant because it was before the 2 March 1994 Adelaide bombing of the NCA. There refuse to allow me to provide a statement on that December 1993 conversation.

P.J. Lamb’s claim that “matters raised by you [me] do not fit within the role of the National Crime Authority.” is false and intended to further conceal issues of NCA incompetence, negligence and corruption. Bowen was acting within NCA policy when he accepted ‘Ndrangheta money then opened a package of unknown contents, with NCA lawyer Peter Wallis, that killed him. His last words, according to Peter Wallis, were “I hope this isn’t a bomb” – seconds later he was dead – the newspaper reporting of which was not included in the false records of newspapers [fake archives] version of the news with the false date of his murder.

These matters of fact are deliberate and carefully considered acts of corruption and are not a result of administration errors. The instructions to falsify NCA/ACC/ACIC records are Breaches of public trust and the cost to me [$300 for 150 pages of rubbish] and the distress caused by my resulting knowledge that the NCA is corrupt has improperly caused detriment to me and is corruption as defined by the National Anti Corruption Commission Act (2022)

The efforts to conceal ‘Ndrangheta (NCA bomber Pere and associates] motivation for the murder of Geoffrey Bowen {an embarrassment to the NCA who placed Geoffrey Bowen in danger and then failed to protect him] includes the participation of others, notably the South Australian police who were part of the joint SAPOL/NCA investigation into the ‘Ndrangheta murder of Geoffrey Bowen.

The NACC can easily see the corruption issues I have raised [both the Adelaide NCA bombing and the State Bank of SA bankruptcy related corruption and crimes concealed] could only happen with instructions to those who have participated in those efforts to conceal the facts of corruption, presumably with the expectation of receiving a benefit for themselves.

The unidentified author of correspondence from the NACC Intake and Triage must have known that his/her claims were false and they were doing what they considered to be what the NACC Commissioner wanted.   

The fact that the NACC correspondence [attached as file ‘NACC reply 21 Sept 2022] has disappeared from my email ‘Inbox’ {I can ‘Copy and Paste’ from email but not email compose screen] certainly suggests that the NACC has a connection to my hacker of email and my computer – but, like the fake archives of newspapers leaving evidence of the falsification of the records, is imperfect.

This text has been sent to the NACC and to attorney general Mark Dreyfus.  

The NACC has ignored my many requests to provide me with an email address to which I can send documentation and information, has no means to provide documents through their contact website and has not acknowledged what I have sent.

If the NACC and attorney general Mark Dreyfus truly believed that the NACC is appropriate and adequate and that the NACC “has not been able to identify a clear allegation of corrupt conduct as defined by the National Anti Corruption Act (2022) then they would be prepared to provide me with written, signed confirmation of their belief.

The Australian Anti Corruption Commission NACC and attorney general Mark Dreyfus are corrupt.

Your acknowledgement of delivery of this correspondence is requested and required.

      Yours Sincerely,   Roger J. Bates  25 September 2023

………..   The text below – email from the NACC dated 20 September 2023 first appeared on the 25 September 2023 when I was writing the in an email compose screen the correspondence above that has been sent to Australia’s federal attorney general Mark Dreyfus. This 20 September email replaced an email from the NAAC dated 21 September 2023 that disappeared hacked from my email ‘Inbox’ file. I had kept a copy that appears further blow – I can ‘Copy & Paste’ from my email but cannot ‘Copy & Paste’ to an email Compose screen to MS Office Word. The email dated 21 September 2023 that has disappeared hacked, appears below the replacement email dated 20 September 2023 The email dated 20 Sept 2023 [below] replacing the hacked email of 21 Sept has no reference to the National Crime Authority NCA that was in the NACC email of 21 Sept 2023

From: no-reply@argus.nacc.gov.au <no-reply@argus.nacc.gov.au>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 3:03 PM
To: @hotmail.com <@>
Subject: FOR INFORMATION: Requested copies of webform submissions [SEC=Official]

Dear Roger,

Thank you for contacting the National Anti-Corruption Commission. We acknowledge receipt of two webform submissions on 27 August and one on 2 September 2023, as well as phone calls on 28 August and 19 September. As requested, please find your webform submissions attached.

The information you have provided is still being considered according to the N_ational Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2022_ (the Act). We will assess whether there is a corruption issue within our jurisdiction and if so, whether and how we should deal with it and advise you accordingly.

We aim to complete the assessment within 90 days of receipt. Until then, we are unable to provide an update and we will only contact you if we require additional information.

Yours Sincerely,

Intake and Triage

……………

Below – The email that has disappeared hacked from my email files. It appears there is a connection between the Australian National Anti Corruption Commission and my hacker of many years who has previously hacked my email, posts to WordPress and my personal computer.

Response to Webform ID: 202382761749-5563 [SEC=Official]

no-reply@argus.nacc.gov.au

You

Dear Roger,

Thank you for contacting the National Anti-Corruption Commission (the Commission) on 27 August 2023.

From the information you have provided regarding the bombing of the National Crime Authority, the Commission has not been able to identify a clear allegation of corrupt conduct as defined by the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act (2022). As a result, the Commission is unable to take any further action in this matter.

While corrupt conduct can take many forms, the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act (2022) defines it to mean situations where:

• a public official does something that breaches the public trust (which means using official powers for an improper purpose)
• a public official abuses their office as a public official (which means using their position for the purpose of improperly gaining a benefit for themselves or improperly causing a detriment to someone else)
• a public official misuses information they have access to in their capacity as a public official, or
• any person (whether or not they are a public official) does something or tries to do something that might cause a public official to carry out their duties in a dishonest or biased way.

Further information on what is corruption can be found here https://www.nacc.gov.au/reporting-and-investigating-corruption/what-corrupt-conduct.

Should additional information become available to support an allegation of corrupt conduct, please provide it to us.

Yours sincerely,

Intake and Triage

…….

This post to WordPress has been directed to the attention of the National Anti Corruption Commission with a request that they acknowledge viewing it and all other information in posts to WordPress and that the NACC further specify exactly what information and documented evidence of corruption and crimes concealed I have provided is considered the work of the National Crime Authority [NCA since renamed the ACC then the ACIC] & had the NCA/ACC/ACIC claim responsibility for and is therefore exempt from any consideration for investigation by the NACC

Posts to WordPress is the only means by which appropriate/adequate contact can be made with the NAAC that refuses to provide an email address so that documents & information can be sent.

State Bank of SA – A taxpayer guaranteed Ponzi Scheme

SBSA V Rothchilds NSC Vic Supreme Court 10 Aug 1990

On the 17 February 1989 the State Bank of South Australia paid $16,053,005.72 to Rothschild Australia Limited for the bad debt of the National Safety Council of Australia Victorian Division (NSCA).

The State Bank of South Australia already had bad debt of the National Safety Council of Australia Victorian Division (NSCA) of $400 million from 1986 that it had since then known it would never recover. The National Safety Council of Australia Victorian Division (NSCA) was a Ponzi scheme.

Since 1986 the State Bank of SA could only exist on borrowed money creating ever increasing debt and so became a taxpayer guaranteed Ponzi scheme with its debt concealed by fraudulent accounting using ‘Off Balance Sheet’ entities that ‘The Advertiser’ newspaper finally referred to in February 1991. Newspaper articles published in February 1991 referring to SBSA’s hidden debt, headlined ‘State Bank in Loans setback’, 58 firms in State Bank web’, ‘Our companies in red – State Bank’, have been removed from records of newspapers published within Australia’s public libraries. A newspaper article of 11 February 1991 headlined “Warning signs were there for more than 14 months”, still within the records [fake archives], refers to those news articles missing from the fake archives. Nothing more on of the “58 firms in State Bank web” concealed within the bank’s ‘Off Balance Sheet” entities was ever mentioned by any news media that will not comment on the evidence of the false records of newspapers published.

The internet website https://iknow.cch.com.au/document/atagUio384994sl10517843/state-bank-of-south-australia-v-rothschild-australia-limited-ors  

“financial collapse in March 1989 of the National Safety Council of Australia Victorian Division (NSCA) which was ordered to be wound up by this Court on 24 April 1989, provisional liquidators having been appointed in March 1989

“On 17 February 1989 NSCA was indebted to the first-named defendant, Rothschild Australia Limited

(RAL), for financial accommodation of $16,053,005.72 for various advances made in August and

September 1988 under a finance facility granted in 1986, and accrued interest. NSCA, and in particular

its chief executive officer, one John Friedrich, arranged during February 1989 to borrow from the

plaintiff, State Bank of South Australia, sufficient to discharge the debt owed to RAL under the 1986

finance facility. The plaintiff accordingly paid the sum of $16,053,005.72 to RAL on 17 February 1989”

News article 11 February 1991 page 6 headlined ‘Riding hell for leather into trouble’ written by journalist Malcom Newell

Second column line 7 “The bank’s silly foray into the National Safety Council of Victoria was just the beginning.”   indicates that the journalist Malcolm Newell and ‘The Advertiser’ newspaper knew of loan[s] made by the State Bank of South Australia to the National Safety Council of Australia Victoria division. This one sentence in this news article was the total of any news media reference to any loan[s] made by the State Bank of SA to National Safety Council of Australia Victoria division.

The amount of $16,053,005.72 was added to 1986 $400 million in loans [2 x $200 million] made by SBSA to the NSCA Vic division.

The bank was a Ponzi scheme and made a gift of this $16,053,005.72 to Rothschild Australia Limited that made a profit at the expense of Australian taxpayer guarantors of the bank.  All details of the unspecified billions of dollars of State Bank of SA debt have been concealed from taxpayer. A secret report of the state’s auditor general has never been made public. News media and Australia’s law enforcement financial reporting authority [Australian Securities and Investment Commission, renamed from the ASC] is aware of this unaccounted for public debt that it assists to conceal. 

A State Bank of SA Royal Commission of inquiry at a cost of $50 million heard secret testimony & must have been aware of the crimes of the State Bank of SA but disclosed nothing to taxpayers. The last meeting of the State Bank’s board of directors voted to grant themselves unlimited taxpayer funded legal representation on matters related to the bank’s bankruptcy.  South Australia’s attorney general Chris Sumner described the State Bank of SA Royal Commission as “a lawyer’s jamboree” after which he had a nervous breakdown, attempted to alight from his chauffeur driven limousine while it was in traffic & moving. Attorney general Chris Sumner shortly after retired from politics.

Australian state & federal politicians, law enforcement and news media continue to conspire to conceal corruption and crimes & refuse to acknowledge the evidence of their corruption.

Above – Sent to Australia National Anti Corruption Commission with much more.

Posts to this WordPress site have been hacked. Text has been removed but documents appear to be accessible.

News article 11 February 1991 page 6 headlined ‘Riding hell for leather into trouble’ written by journalist Malcom Newell Second column line 7 “The bank’s silly foray into the National Safety Council of Victoria was just the beginning.” indicates that the journalist Malcolm Newell and ‘The Advertiser’ newspaper knew of loan[s] made by the State Bank of South Australia to the National Safety Council of Australia Victoria division. This one sentence in this news article was the total of any news media reference to any loan[s] made by the State Bank of SA to National Safety Council of Australia Victoria division.

Newspaper articles published in February 1991 referring to SBSA’s hidden debt, headlined ‘State Bank in Loans setback’, 58 firms in State Bank web’, ‘Our companies in red – State Bank’, have been removed from records of newspapers published within Australia’s public libraries. A newspaper article of 11 February 1991 headlined “Warning signs were there for more than 14 months”, still within the records [fake archives], refers to those news articles missing from the fake archives. Nothing more on of the “58 firms in State Bank web” concealed within the bank’s ‘Off Balance Sheet” entities was ever mentioned by any news media that will not comment on the evidence of the false records of newspapers published.